In April this year, the US government issued a report claiming that C17 had flown dangerously close to the runway and then crashed into a grassy area near the airport.

The official report concluded that C5 had failed to control its aircraft and that C3 had lost control of its tail rotor, which led to the crash.

The US Department of Transportation (DOT) released a statement saying the agency had investigated the crash and that the crash site had been examined by US experts.

But this week, a new report by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) found that the NTSB report did not mention the grassy location in which the C17 crashed.

Instead, the NTSBs report referred to a “crash site” in the south-eastern part of Texas.

“The NTSB’s report does not state whether the crash sites where debris was found were located in the same vicinity, or if debris was also found at the crash location,” said NTSB spokesperson Scott Bresnahan.

In its report, the NTSB did not include the grass-covered crash site where the C15 plane crashed.

The NTSB also did not state that the debris found at that crash site was found in a location which the US Government was claiming was a crash site.

“There is no evidence to support the government’s assertions that the C7 aircraft, which was carrying more than 3,000 passengers, was flying dangerously close when it crashed,” Breshahan said.

The crash site The NTSBs investigators used satellite imagery to look at the impact of the C14 plane, the C16 plane and the C19 plane.

The wreckage was recovered from a grass field in the middle of the Texas Panhandle, in the town of Panhandle.

The aircrafts wreckage was found near the intersection of Highway 101 and Highway 290 in the Panhandle near the village of Westmoreland.

The area around the crash was covered with large grass and had been cleared of vegetation.

The air traffic controllers at Panhandle International Airport, which operated C17 between Houston and San Antonio, said the area was well covered.

The airport said that all flights were diverted to other airports in the area.

The NTSBs report did note that debris was discovered at the site, but not in a specific location.

According to the NTSb, the debris was located near a grass-dotted area, but the location was not clearly marked.

“It appears that some of the debris at the location may have been caused by a combination of a pilot error and debris from the impact area,” the report said.

“However, the majority of the material is consistent with a crash that occurred at the grass site.”

The NTSbs report said that “some debris may have entered the ground” and that debris had also been found in the vicinity of the crash zone.

“Some of the soil and vegetation was located about 1.5 to 2 metres away from the crash debris, suggesting that it was deposited during the flight and not later in the crash sequence.”

The report also stated that “the debris was generally consistent with the debris that was later found at crash site”.

In its initial report, NTSB investigators said the crash had been caused when the C1 plane was “over-inflated” by C2.

The plane had been “operated by an inexperienced pilot” and had “an unsafe approach procedure”.

“While the pilot and co-pilot were in control of the aircraft at the time of the accident, the co-platoon was not present in the aircraft during the initial approach,” the NTSBS report said, adding that the crew was in control during the final approach to the airport, and “was not in control when the aircraft lost control and collided with the ground.”

The wreckage The NTSb said the debris which was recovered was “consistent with a C1 aircraft” that was “operated as follows: by an experienced pilot.”

According to FAA data, the aircrafts manufacturer had installed a system that would have allowed the aircraft to carry three people.

The pilot was responsible for controlling the aircraft, and the co and co pilot were responsible for piloting.

The flight instructor was responsible “for maintaining flight and handling standards”.

The pilot and the flight instructor were in the cockpit during the descent to the ground and during the subsequent recovery, the report added.

The investigation into the C18 plane crash will focus on “the pilot and flight instructor”, and the NTSbs investigators said that they had found evidence which indicated that the pilot had been in control.

“Given the extensive wreckage found at site, it appears that there was a pilot in control,” the FAA said in a statement.

The C17 plane was carrying 1,093 people, including 189 passengers, when it ran out of fuel at around 11:30am local time on May 29.

The passengers were evacuated to the nearby